Marvel's legendary comic hero, Daredevil - known as The Man Without Fear - comes to the big screen. Attorney Matt Murdock (Ben Affleck) is blind, but his other four senses function with superhuman sharpness. By day, Murdock represents the downtrodden as a lawyer at the law firm Nelson and Murdock that he started with his friend Franklin "Foggy" Nelson (Jon Favreau). At night, he is Daredevil, a masked vigilante stalking the dark streets of the city, a relentless avenger of justice. Together with his love interest Elektra Natchios (Jennifer Garner), he must battle New York's crime Kingpin, Wilson Fisk (Michael Clarke Duncan) and his assassin with perfect aim, Bullseye (Colin Farrell).
Comic book films are a genre of their own. Last year they achieved a new status in Hollywood when Spider-Man became the highest grossing film of the year and the fifth highest of all time. Even the success of Spidey's feature helped raise the budget on this year's much darker superhero vehicle, Daredevil. More along the lines of the original Batman, Daredevil is a hero of the night with many internal struggles. The violence is grittier and the overall feel a lot less light-hearted than the fun of Spider-Man. So how was Daredevil?
I was really impressed by Ben Affleck's shot at the masked avenger. I thought he played the part well although I must admit I have no previous knowledge on the comic book version of Daredevil. The filmmakers did a good job fleshing out Murdock's character and history but fail in developing almost every other character. Farrell's Bullseye character was pretty fun to watch on the screen (when he wasn't impaling someone's head or throat with a random object), but you know nothing about who he is, where he came from or anything. Same goes for the completely cardboard Kingpin played by Michael Clarke Duncan. What made Spider-Man so successful was the well-rounded character development of all of the major characters. The Kingpin was so hollow in Daredevil, it was almost boring when he was on the screen. How did the Kingpin become the Kingpin? Why doed he do what he does? Why even bother making him a villain if he's so "ho-hum" to watch? They even cheese him out completely by inserting completely lame music during one of his intro moments to supposedly make him cooler or more menacing but instead it makes his introduction more laughable. By inserting such forgettable and downright pathetic music into the film's soundtrack, the film is not only severely dated but now aimed at the teen crowd with poor taste in musical preferences. It clashed with the movie and did nothing more than hurt it. Joe Pantoliano served as the reporter Ben Ulrich who has an interest in Daredevil but suffers from occasional screentime and little to no development as well. Foggy, Matt's assistant, played by Jon Favreau, was great comic relief but wasn't around enough to lighten up the film as much as it needed to be.
Content-wise, the film is probably one of the most violent pop comic book films you'll see. Sure it's not Spawn or other darker comic book characters, but for the audience it's being pitched to (the same who saw Spidey, basically), it includes an excessive amount of graphic violence, an unnecessary implied sex scene and moderate but unnecessary language. So what in the world is redeemable about this would-be flop? Well, the movie wasn't a total loss. Affleck did turn in a great and believable performance as the blind hero, but he didn't exactly have Michael Keaton's charm as Batman or the almost-innocence of Tobey MacGuire's Peter Parker in Spider-Man. While the scenes of the younger Matt were not executed nearly as well, they were forgivable. The action sequences were interesting enough, specifically Matt and Elektra's scuffle in a playground and Daredevil's match with Bullseye (despite a potential reference to a battle of Christ vs. the devil, which in that case I would consider offensive). The concept of Daredevil was interesting as well as what drives him and his lifestyle, but just something overall in the picture lacked considerably.
Daredevil is a sure-fire film that misses its mark by quite a bit. While it has its redeemable moments and some great characters, it falls short. If the content below wouldn't bother you, you may want to catch a matinee or something, but otherwise look forward to the more promising X-Men 2 or hold out for next year's Spider-Man 2 if you need a comic flick fix. The decision's up to you.- John DiBiase (reviewed: 2/16/03)
Disclaimer: All reviews are based solely on the opinions of the reviewer. Most reviews are rated on how the reviewer enjoyed the film overall, not exclusively on content. However, if the content really affects the reviewer's opinion and experience of the film, it will definitely affect the reviewer's overall rating.
|Newsboys United Tour Adds 40 Fall Dates|
Fri 13 Jul 2018 22:35:00 EST
|Hillsong Worship Releases "There Is More: Studio Sessions" EP Today|
Fri 13 Jul 2018 22:25:00 EST
|Two Time Grammy Nominee Lauren Daigle Returns with New Album, Single, and Tour|
Fri 13 Jul 2018 16:45:00 EST
|Jesus Culture Set to Release Live Album August 31|
Fri 13 Jul 2018 11:45:00 EST
|Jesus Culture to Bring "Living With A Fire" Tour to Nearly 20 Markets This Fall|
Fri 13 Jul 2018 11:45:00 EST
|Martin Smith's "Love Song For A City," Recorded Live In 11 Countries, Releases|
Wed 11 Jul 2018 18:35:00 EST