Intolerable Cruelty is a romantic comedy about a man who wins in court and a woman who courts to win. George Clooney portrays Miles Massey, a prominent Los Angeles divorce attorney who has everything— and in some cases, two of everything. Despite his impressive client list, a formidable win record, the respect of his peers and an ironclad contract (the "Massey pre-nup") named after him, he's reached a crossroads in his life. Sated on success, boredom has set in and he's looking for new challenges. All that changes when Miles meets his match in the devastating Marylin Rexroth (Catherine Zeta-Jones). Marylin is the soon-to-be ex-wife of his client Rex Rexroth (Edward Herrmann), a wealthy real estate developer and habitual philanderer. With the help of hard charging private investigator Gus Petch (Cedric The Entertainer), she has Rex nailed and is looking forward to the financial independence a successful divorce will bring. But thanks to Miles' considerable skills, she ends up with nothing. Not to be outdone, Marylin schemes to get even and that's when things get a little out of hand... especially when Massey finds himself falling for the conniving Marylin... (summary from IntolerableCruelty.com)

Catherine Zeta Jones has always been a favorite to watch since she caught the public's eye over five years ago in The Mask of Zorro with Antonio Banderas. George Clooney has always been a least favorite as something about him has just always rubbed me the wrong way. However, in 2001, his performance as Danny Ocean in the remake Ocean's 11 won me some respect for the actor in his ability to play characters so well. This is no exception for this year's quirky comedy Intolerable Cruelty. In fact, the best thing about Intolerable Cruelty, oddly enough for me, is Clooney's performance. Dare I say it -- and forgive me -- but his neurotic shenanigans in this film reminded me a lot of the charming Cary Grant in such dark comedic films like this in Arsenic and Old Lace. While that might be true, Clooney's Grant-ish performance isn't enough to save this awkward and often lacking comedy.

While Catherine Zeta Jones remains a gorgeous actress five years into her stardom, that's about all she has going for her in Intolerable Cruelty. Like in America's Sweethearts, The Haunting, and here, Catherine plays mostly unlikable spoiled brats. Why she hasn't picked a truly deep and likable role (that I have seen) in awhile, I don't really know. The problem with her character being so scheming and shallow in Intolerable... is that it makes the romantic moments kinda hard to swallow. Besides her looks, what does Clooney's character see in her? She's not given enough depth in the film to really help you understand why Massey feels he must be with her.

What the film does have going for it is the few true laugh-out-loud moments. These usually involved Clooney's neurotic behavior or most of the time he's interacting with his partner Wrigley. The film was often too risque for my tastes. It felt a little like Liar Liar in its court themes based around sexual infidelity. Vulgarity was moderate with a waitress in a diner spouting the "f" word frivolously and several other colorful words are used throughout the film. But I was ready to throw something at the screen if they used the phrase "nail his *ss" one more time. Could they say it enough? It was used well over twenty times and it just felt juvenile after awhile. There is some violence including one scene where a person accidentally kills himself and it's played for laughs. Sadly, the surprise of the moment is relatively humorous but quite distasteful. Otherwise, this film bathes in sexuality to the point of just being overbearing. If it were a little less risque, it'd been much more enjoyable.

So the verdict? Skip it. It might be in the same style of some old school screwball comedies a la Cary Grant, but it isn't content-wise. Some might enjoy it, but I personally don't recommend it. - John DiBiase (reviewed: 10/12/03)

** Disclaimer: All reviews are based solely on the opinions of the reviewer. Most reviews are rated on how the reviewer enjoyed the film overall, not on content. However, if the content really affects the reviewer's opinion of the film, it will definitely affect the reviewer's rating.