The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers begins in the hills of Emyn Muil, where lost Hobbits Frodo
(Elijah Wood) and Sam (Sean Astin) discover they are being followed by the mysterious Gollum (Andy Serkis).
Across Middle-earth Aragorn (Viggo Mortensen), the Elf archer Legolas (Orlando Bloom) and Gimli the Dwarf
(John Rhys-Davies) encounter the besieged Rohan kingdom, whose once great King Theoden (Bernard Hill) has
fallen under Saruman's deadly spell through the manipulations of his spy, the sinister Wormtongue
(Brad Dourif). In their parallel journeys, the Fellowship will face unimaginable armies and deception while
also witnessing ancient wonders and the untapped strength of their people. Together they must stand against
the powerful forces spreading from the Two Towers - Orthanc Tower in Isengard, where the corrupted wizard
Saruman has bred a lethal army 10,000 strong; and Sauron's fortress at Barad-d–r, deep within the dark lands
When I saw The Fellowship of the Ring last year, I was met with mixed emotions and was unsure
about how to embrace the film's personality and content. While I normally have a bone with films glorifying
magic, wizards and filled with demonic looking creatures, something about The Lord of the Rings seemed
oddly different. Perhaps because it was penned by a Christian, I'm not sure. But since January of 2002, I have seen
The Fellowship... several times, including the relatively recent "extended" DVD edition (very cool)
and have acquired an appreciation for the film and story. It really is an amazing story and relative to our
struggle with sin and temptation. Naturally, with the ridiculously painful cliff-hanger at the end of the first
film, I just couldn't wait to see the second installment, this year's The Two Towers. What I was met
with was a completely different approach and an undoubtedly amazing film.
It's arguable to describe The Fellowship as a really slow movie but containing pertinent information
to the background of the story and building up of the characters. Fellowship's strongest point was the
one-tracks story focus involving Frodo, Samwise, Merry, Pippin and their quest with the fellowship. In The Two Towers,
the fellowship has broken and the story is split into at least three (sometimes four or more) different views
as we keep checking in with different characters on different stages of their quest. While this worked just fine
and well here, I didn't like this aspect as much as when the group was all together. However, I really enjoyed
the greater focus on and development of Aragorn, Legolas, and Gimli. All the new characters were good additions
and the special effects were often as good as the first film or better (except maybe when Merry and Pippin
are riding Treebeard). Frodo and Samwise's presence was diminished considerably compared to Fellowship, but with
Gollum's part beefed up and given great focus, a new spin was added to a lot of their scenes. I loved watching
Gollum's schizophrenic personality as he literally argued with himself as he battled temptations. I felt I could
relate to his inner struggles and it was amazing to see such life from a completely CGI character. The live action
characters interacted well with him too.
Violence is just as ever present -- and probably moreso -- as it was in The Fellowship of the Ring. A massive,
epic battle scene at Helm's Deep takes place about 2 hours into the film and lasts for a pretty long time while featuring
seemingly endless sequences of sword fighting and arrows flying everywhere. But never did the action get tiresome or
boring. Instead it was gripping and exciting while not being especially graphic or gory. In fact, during the entire
battle sequence, I don't recall a single instance of blood or gore. Earlier in the film there is a sequence where
the Orcs are ambushed by a group of men on horseback and we see a few Orc heads fly. This may be disturbing to
some -- as it would for me normally -- but considering how downright disgusting and hideous these characters are,
it's tempting to celebrate a little Orc decapitation from time to time.
Humor exists, mainly in the form of the dwarf Gimli and his silly prideful comments. Thankfully the comedy
never dips into the cheesey or corny it could and is used at just the right moments. The acting is solid and
the story tight. All I can say is I anticipate the final chapter greatly and will hate to see the story
end, but it'll be awesome to finally see the resolution.
Overall, I thought the second installment of this story was excellent. A little different but still
never straying from its purpose, the continuation of this great fictional story is awesome and sets the
story up nicely for its grand finale next year. This is NOT a family or children's film as there
are plenty of horrific images from the faces of the Orc monsters to even the creepy slithering creature
Gollum. The film is indeed a sight to behold as the first was, but it is not for everyone. Take caution.
- John DiBiase
Parental Guide: Brief Summary of Content
Blood/Gore: Theoden's son was injured in an unseen battle. We see him laying in
bed with some blood on the right side of his face. Merry has some blood on his face.
We see dead faces beneath the surface of the water in a swamp. It's neither bloody or gory but it is bound to be disturbing to some people.
We see a pile of charred Orc bodies but there isn't enough detail to make it especially gory. We also see
an Orc head on a stick next to the pile.
Gandalf has some blood under his nose in a flashback.
Gollum breaks the back of a dead rabbit and tears some flesh from it.
Following a battle, we see a tiny bit of blood on Gimli's axe. We also see a dead horse with some blood
on it. While Legolas talks to an Orc who has been fatally wounded, we see it has some blood on its face.
Aragorn has a bloody wound on this shoulder.
Violence: Extreme. Various battle sequences,
characters fight with swords, arrows, etc, other assorted violence.
** Disclaimer: All reviews are based solely on the opinions of the reviewer. Most
reviews are rated on how the reviewer enjoyed the film overall, not on content. However, if the content
really affects the reviewer's opinion of the film, it will definitely affect the reviewer's rating.