When a Chinese rebel murder's Chon's estranged father and escapes to England, Chon and Roy make their way to London with revenge on their minds. Chon's sister, Lin, has the same idea and uncovers a worldwide conspiracy to murder the royal family but almost no one will believe her. With the help of a kindly Scotland Yard inspector and a 10-year old street urchin, the acrobatic Chon gives Victorian Britain a kick in the pants as he attempts to avenge his father's death and keep the romance-minded Roy away from his sister.
Ah sequels. Surprisingly, the idea for a sequel to 2000's Shanghai Noon was thought of before the release of Noon. While Shanghai Noon took place almost entirely in the old west, Shanghai Knights is set almost entirely in late 1880's London, England. While Jackie's character Chon was the fish-out-of-water in the first film, both his and Owen's Roy O'Bannan are both out of place in Knights. Naturally, hilarity ensues. But is it executed to its fullest potential? Well, yes and no.
Shanghai Knights is a pleasing follow up to the fun and unique Noon, but doesn't come away without a mild case of sequelitis. The strongest points of Knights lies within the clever and highly enjoyable to watch action sequences brilliantly choreographed by Jackie Chan himself. The most notable ones include a brawl inside a personal library (complete with a ladder on wheels), a scuffle in a street market, and a run-in involving a classic hotel revolving door, among a few other shorter moments. The biggest problems also came along with some of these fight scenes. Where director Dobkin tripped up the worst was when silly sounds and ragtime music accompanied the revolving door sequence and an over-exaggerated (yet still fun for the most part) fight with umbrellas to the tune of "Singing in the Rain" took the film to a cheesey level that Noon never dared to tread (which was Tom Dey's directorial work the first time around). While just a few scenes in Noon utilized "cooler" tunes from that of ZZ Top and Aerosmith to enhance a bar fight and getaway while still holding onto its integrity, the goofy -- and way too frequently used -- music overpowered some of the amazing and fun stunts (not to mention a few embarrassingly silly moments during the street market scene) here. The music chosen just didn't fit and often detracted from the otherwise brilliant sequences. Oddly, about half-way through the film, as the momentum continued to build, Knights' overall feel changed back to include a lot of the funny and charming moments that made Noon as wonderful to watch as it was.
Fann Wong was a great addition to the cast as Chon's sister and it was great to see her kick plenty of butt alongside Chon and Roy. Another character that wasn't necessary but didn't overstay his welcome as badly as he could have was the 10-year-old street boy Charlie. While irritating when he was meant to be at times, and was around more often than I would have liked, he works well enough with the story to not hinder the overall outcome of the film. The villains were worthy adversaries to Chon and Roy and we even get to see Lin have a humorous run-in with a famous British villain. It was also nice to see Roy and Chon together for almost the entire movie while in Noon we had to wait awhile before the two teamed up.
Content-wise, Knights resorts to one-too-many sexually-related comments and moments. Noon touched on the subject here and there but hardly stayed on it too long. Unfortunately Knights relies on the subject matter way too often for jokes and laughs that it sometimes becomes uncomfortable. In the blood and action violence category, the film is chock-full of violence but never becomes explicitly graphic. The only instance we see any blood is a minimal amount dried on a knife and a tiny bit on Chon's shirt after being cut there.
In summary, I found the movie enjoyable despite its occasional schizophrenic nature with being goofy at times and true to its predecessor at others (which thankfully was more often the case) -- not to mention the unnecessary amount of sensual material in the film. It was really great seeing Owen Wilson and Jackie Chan back together in their roles and without it being a complete rehashing of the first film. If you enjoyed the first film and can stomach the moderate sensuality, you'll want to check out this film. However, you may want to leave the kids at home.- John DiBiase (reviewed: 1/25/03)
Disclaimer: All reviews are based solely on the opinions of the reviewer. Most reviews are rated on how the reviewer enjoyed the film overall, not exclusively on content. However, if the content really affects the reviewer's opinion and experience of the film, it will definitely affect the reviewer's overall rating.
|Over 35 Artists Will Celebrate 35 #1 Hits and the 35th Anniversary of Michael W. Smith's "Friends"|
Wed 12 Dec 2018 15:50:00 EST
|Francesca Battistelli Performs With Andrea Bocelli For Worldwide TV Christmas Special Airing Dec. 20|
Wed 12 Dec 2018 15:30:00 EST
|Compassion LIVE's "Real Magic Tour" with Harris III To Take Flight This March And April|
Wed 12 Dec 2018 15:15:00 EST
|Zach Williams Receives Third GRAMMY Nomination For "Survivor: Live From Harding Prison"|
Tue 11 Dec 2018 12:20:00 EST
|Brian Johnson's Authentic Account Of Anxiety Battle "When God Becomes Real" Out Feb. 5|
Mon 10 Dec 2018 22:20:00 EST
|Newsboys United and Michael W. Smith Join Forces for Spring Tour|
Mon 10 Dec 2018 12:30:00 EST