Frankenstein's creature finds himself caught in an all-out, centuries old war between two immortal clans. (from IMDB.com)
It's usually a sure thing that a movie is a bomb waiting to be dropped when its release date is not only pushed off once for several months, but for a second time to a year later. The sci-fi action film, I, Frankenstein, is based on a graphic novel by actor/writer/producer Kevin Grevioux, and was brought to the big screen with some serious acting talent to support it, helmed by rookie director Stuart Beattie. The Dark Knight and Thank You For Smoking actor Aaron Eckhart takes on the title character of Frankenstein's monster, Adam, living in modern day. He's pursued by a demon named Naberius, played by Bill Nighy, while caught between a war between the demons and gargoyles, lead by Miranda Otto (The Lord of the Rings) as Leonore. Naberius hopes to study how Dr. Frankenstein brought Adam to life and use that power for his own evil plans. All of this adds up to a quasi-spiritual mythology that ends up being all flair and no substance. Sophomoric direction and a poorly written script are just the start of the problems as I, Frankenstein ends up barely having enough life to get up off the operating table.
While I, Frankenstein is still relatively watchable and entertaining (and doesn't have as much wasted potential as, say, Van Helsing), the film feels like an idea and concept with potential that isn't fully realized. It's one of those stories and films that, in the right hands, may have turned out to be something fun and special. Instead, I, Frankenstein never rises above bargain bin quality and makes the viewer wonder what in the world any of the actors involved in the film were thinking when they signed up for this. It's the kind of silly fantasy film that takes itself far more seriously than it has any right to, where some humor or sense of adventure could have really jolted its system. With Eckhart having previously played Two-Face/Harvey Dent skillfully in The Dark Knight, and having starred in plenty of acclaimed indie films in his career, you have to wonder what made him choose a sloppy flick like this one to headline. Similarly, while Bill Nighy isn't always the most discerning when signing up for a role (while I enjoyed Wrath of the Titans for the most part, his role was pretty miniscule in it), you really do expect more from him. And despite having a truly great voice for a villain (Davy Jones in Pirates of the Caribbean 2 and 3 is a great example of this), not even his delivery can save some truly awful dialog he's forced to say.
And that's really the biggest shame about I, Frankenstein. If it weren't for a skilled cast assembled here, no one would think twice about this film. Great care was clearly taken for the look of the film; the set pieces are relatively impressive and even Adam's own makeup is pretty good. However, the demon makeup is comical at best, looking more like something from a bad TV show or a Carman music video from the 90s than something worthy of a blockbuster action film like this one. And the CG effects aren't anything to write home about. While some of it does indeed work, things like the gargoyles and their cartoony faces just aren't good enough to be taken seriously here. There were creepier effects and makeup applications in the 1999 reboot of The Mummy than this 2014 (well, 2013, originally) release. You'd think greater strides would have been made in 15 years. (And can I mention just how much more fun the 1999 version of The Mummy is? While it may border on being too campy for its own good, the film knows how to be creepy and still not take itself too seriously. But don't get me started on it's two terrible sequels.)
To be fair, I, Frankenstein isn't really a total loss. I'd be lying if I said I haven't seen worse films. It's because of the acting talent being watchable that this film is bearable. Eckhart, despite doing little more than brooding throughout the entire film, is still an appealing actor to watch and you can't help but root for him as the underdog here. And Nighy is just a pleasure to watch. Miranda Otto, who played Eowyn in the two Lord of the Rings follow-ups, is just too good for this film and script. And Caitlin Stasey and Mahesh Jadu make a good pair as gargoyles, but the story literally dismisses them a half-hour into the film. Sadly, we get stuck with Kevin Grevioux as Dekar who seems to be in the film just because he wrote the original graphic novel used as the film's screen story. His unusually deep voice is so distracting that it just sounds sorely out of place in the film (and unintentionally comical). He's not a strong actor and this film does nothing but reinforce that fact. And while TV star Yvonne Strahovski (Chuck) might seem like she'd be a nice addition to the cast, playing that sterotypically unrealistically attractive scientist, she's not given much to do and ultimately just sticks out as another out-of-place actor in the film. The story itself does have promise though; the gargoyles are ultimately angelic figures (one is even called Gideon), and serve as soldiers of God. They battle hordes of demons that intend to possess dead bodies to be reanimated to form an army to wipe out the humans, and Adam gets reluctantly caught in the middle of it. The whole demon theme, however, will be unsettling for some, so if you actually do intend to check out this film, that's something to be careful of. It's ultimately a battle of good versus evil presented in a very fantastical way, so I don't think it's something to take too seriously. I just found the spiritual aspect of the plot empty. When they began explaining the different sides, I was interested to see where this plot might go, but it ultimately proves to be pretty vapid.
The content is pretty intense for a PG-13 film, however most of it is violence that is special-effects driven. We do see some brief close-ups in fast flashbacks of stitching on Adam's body (specifically his arms). Then, throughout the film, we see Adam with scars all over his body. The worst of it, though, might be when we see someone stitching up a bloody wound on his back after a fight. There's also a very brief, distant long shot of a cadaver on a table and it kind of looks like it's cut open with organs exposed, but it's far enough away from the viewer that it's not too obviously graphic. The rest of the violence primarily deals with demons in human form being stabbed or sliced with something and then suddenly exploding in fiery balls of bones and ash. It's not particularly gory or gruesome, and it's always done fast and in obvious computer animation, but some may be disturbed by the idea. There's no real sexual content, however, and the only profanity is one use of the "S" word and a couple debatable uses of "h*ll" and "d*mn."
Overall, I, Frankenstein strives to be something big and significant, but it crashes and burns instead. The scope of the film is sizable, but sadly in more of a nonsensical way than anything. Things like unexplainably empty streets that should be busy and the fact that the secret world of demons and gargoyles isn't very subtly disguised just add an air of silliness to the production. It can feel big one moment and pitifully small another. Add in a hearty dose of amateurish dialog and you have a movie that is far more flawed than it needs to be. Instead of being a fun adventure movie, I, Frankenstein is almost instantly forgettable.- John DiBiase (reviewed: 5/12/14)
Creating A Monster (13:00) - The first featurette delves into the makeup design and application, character design for the film, and more about the production aspects.
Frankenstein's Creatures (14:18) covers the film's story by Kevin Grevioux a bit, but doesn't really delve into the inspiration of the story or how the film differs from the graphic novel. It is still an interesting behind-the-scenes featurette, however. (1 "S" word from the scene in the film in a clip)- John DiBiase, (reviewed: 5/12/14)
Disclaimer: All reviews are based solely on the opinions of the reviewer. Most reviews are rated on how the reviewer enjoyed the film overall, not exclusively on content. However, if the content really affects the reviewer's opinion and experience of the film, it will definitely affect the reviewer's overall rating.
|TobyMac's Hits Deep Tour Gives Back in Cities Across U.S.|
Wed, 19 Feb 2020 19:20:00 EST
|Getty Music's Part Two of "The Life of Christ Qunitology: Passion" Releases Feb. 21|
Wed, 19 Feb 2020 19:20:00 EST
|VaShawn Mitchell To Lead International Worship and Arts Summit Feb 26 - 29 in Columbia SC|
Wed, 19 Feb 2020 12:40:00 EST
|Curb Records' Natalie Grant Unveils Powerful New Single, "My Weapon"|
Tue, 18 Feb 2020 22:20:00 EST
|John Schlitt To Release New Studio Album "Go" February 28|
Tue, 18 Feb 2020 22:20:00 EST
|Remedy Drive's David Zach Joins Anti-Trafficking Event at U.S. Capitol|
Tue, 18 Feb 2020 22:20:00 EST