When a financially-troubled father named John Q. Archibald (Denzel Washington) is encountering one hardship after another, disaster strikes when his young son Mike collapses during a little league baseball game. Upon taking him to a local hospital, he and his wife are told his son needs a heart transplant or he will die. In the midst of trying everything John can to raise the large sum of money for the cost of the surgery, the hospital decides to cease treating Mike. In a fit of complete desperation, John takes over the hospital's E.R. room demanding treatment for his son. The rest is a suspense-filled fight for his son's life.
Does it ever baffle you how a movie can look so good in a preview, and include such a promising cast
and premise, but turn out being flawed beyond belief? Of course not much is worse than the last bomb Zoolander
which had a promising cast, but John Q. will most likely make you wonder why it wasn't put together better.
Denzel Washington delivers an exceptionally good performance here as a desperate father who will do anything
to save the life of his young boy who's deathly ill. The film he's given to work with has a promising premise
and cast, but is bogged down by an overbearing message against HMOs, poor script-writing, and poorly written
supporting characters. James Woods' cardiologist character Dr. Turner is portrayed as too uncaring and cynical,
as is Anne Heche's flat hospital administrator, Rebecca Payne. Robert Duvall's Lt. Frank Grimes who plays
the hostage negotiator just isn't given much to work with. While a better-written film might allow the kind
of relationship Tommy Lee Jones' character had to Harrison Ford's in The Fugitive, the filmmakers here
just come up short on the strong support here. It's left up to Washington to carry the film himself, and he
succeeds, but only as much as he possibly can with what he's been given. His scenes are enjoyable to watch,
especially with the sufficient characters created to accompany him in the E.R. (with the exception of Mitch
who is an irritating low-life). The most fun to watch is actually Eddie Griffin's character Lester who is there
because of a hand injury. Another thing that failed to help the film was the horrible musical score which did
nothing but detract from each scene it was used in. The film just felt cheapened by it as opposed to a really good
score usually enhancing the moments.
Content-wise the film could have fared better. Language was heavy including 2 "f" words, 1 being said in the background (for no apparent reason), 1 spoken by Dr. Turner. Violence is moderate. Being in the E.R., we briefly see a gunshot victim with a bloody chest. Lester's hand is pretty bloody when he's first shown. Also, we see some pretty graphic (but brief) shots of a surgery taking place.
The point the film tries to make about the nation's messed up HealthCare plans is a good one, but by the time you've finished watching the film, you're most-likely going to feel like you've just watched a CNN debate than a drama. It would have been more acceptable in smaller dosages or if it was handled in a more realistic and less preachy fashion. While I was annoyed by most reviews I read on the film picking on this issue, I couldn't help but see their point as I watched the movie.
One thing I was relatively content with, was the film's portrayal of Christianity. John and his wife attend an obviously Christian church, and his wife even refers to herself as "a Christian woman" while adequately living up to the label through the character she was portrayed as. Other references to God are made during the film in a positive light, including Lester suggesting to John that he "let go, and let God."
All in all the film is decent, but not one good enough to recommend. Washington's performance saved what otherwise might have been a waste of film. The sad part is, with better direction, writing, and music, this could have been a strong film.- John DiBiase, (reviewed: 2/16/02)
Disclaimer: All reviews are based solely on the opinions of the reviewer. Most reviews are rated on how the reviewer enjoyed the film overall, not exclusively on content. However, if the content really affects the reviewer's opinion and experience of the film, it will definitely affect the reviewer's overall rating.
|Drew Holcomb and The Neighbors Celebrate Togetherness on New Studio Album|
Wed, 08 Feb 2023 17:25:00 EST
|Elio Alcindor Releases A Hit New Single Premised On The Love For God|
Wed, 08 Feb 2023 17:20:00 EST
|New Version Of Steven Curtis Chapman's "Don't Lose Heart" Feat. Mitchell Tenpenny Releases Feb. 17|
Wed, 08 Feb 2023 16:20:00 EST
|KJ-52 Releases New Single, "No Bad Days (feat. PEABOD)" To Radio|
Wed, 08 Feb 2023 15:50:00 EST
|Dolly Parton and Dionne Warwick Team for Gospel Duet "Peace Like a River"|
Tue, 07 Feb 2023 16:50:00 EST
|Cochren and Co.'s New Album RUNNING HOME Available Now|
Tue, 07 Feb 2023 14:00:00 EST