The greatest adventure of all time begins with "Star Trek," the incredible story of a young crew's maiden voyage onboard the most advanced starship ever created: the U.S.S. Enterprise. On a journey filled with action, comedy and cosmic peril, the new recruits must find a way to stop an evil being whose mission of vengeance threatens all of mankind. The fate of the galaxy rests in the hands of bitter rivals. One, James T. Kirk (Chris Pine), is a delinquent, thrill-seeking Iowa farm boy. The other, Spock (Zachary Quinto), was raised in a logic-based society that rejects all emotion. As fiery instinct clashes with calm reason, their unlikely but powerful partnership is the only thing capable of leading their crew through unimaginable danger, boldly going where no one has gone before... (from MovieWeb.com)
Ah, the "reboot." It's becoming more common in Hollywood film making these days. They did it with Batman, they did it with James Bond, they tried it with Superman, they're about to do it again this month with Terminator Salvation, and they've even commissioned writers to attempt a relaunch of Ghostbusters. Do we really need all of these series to be started over from scratch? After the success of both the Batman and James Bond franchises being given new directions, I suppose it's not necessarily a bad idea. And Star Trek is the latest franchise to be scrapped and started over anew.
The original Star Trek series, which debuted in the mid-60's and only lasted three seasons, bowed out of feature films in the seventh Star Trek film, Generations, in 1994. In it, fans witnessed the onscreen death of their beloved Captain James T. Kirk, and the passing of the torch from the original Star Trek crew on to the crew of Star Trek: The Next Generation. The TNG team took over until the tenth film, Nemesis, in 2002. It's been seven years since Trekkies had a new feature film, and popular TV producer and director turned film director (Mission:Impossible III), J.J. Abrams, has taken over the reigns to start the original franchise over.
Abrams' Star Trek takes viewers all the way back to James Tiberius Kirk's birth. In the film's introduction, we see Kirk as a baby, as a preteen (or young teen), and then mid-twenties, which he remains in for the rest of the film. This film shows how each crew member meets for the very first time. It's fun to see where each character comes from, how they get to know each other, and even to see how some don't even get along when they first meet. Abrams and crew cast a pretty decent contemporary take on the original Trek characters. Chris Pine and Zachary Pinto prove to be inspired casts as Kirk and Spock, respectively. Both capture enough of the original characters to make them seem familiar -- yet, like Daniel Craig's Bond, we know they have yet to grow into the characters fans have come to know and love. Lord Of The Rings' Karl Urban does a pretty good job trying to capture a young Leonard "Bones" McCoy, while Simon Pegg is a fun choice for Scotty. But there are plenty of changes to the characters that Trekkies are likely to not be too keen on. For example, the sexual side of young Uhura (Zoe Saldana) is played up a bit too much, and she's given a romance with another crew member that ought to raise an eyebrow or two. Also, Sulu, who was poorly miscast with John Cho from the Harold & Kumar films, seems virtually nothing at all like the original series character. But in the end, Abrams uses a plot element involving time travel to excuse any and all changes in character made in his new envisioning of the beloved series.
I admit, I have very little emotional attachment to the original Star Trek series. I did go through a time in my younger years where I watched the show, but I eventually got more heavily interested in The Next Generation series before no longer following any Star Trek projects quite as faithfully. Abrams' decision to rework the original characters is a bold and risky effort, but one that proves to be a pretty exciting one. Abrams' Star Trek is indeed more contemporized than any previous Trek film or TV show. In its 2-hour running time, this Star Trek is a highly stylized sci-fi action film that manages to still develop its ensemble cast of characters without getting lost in the science tech talk that most of the shows and its spin-offs revolved around. Surprisingly, Nemesis seemed to cater more to the action side of things as it appeared director Stuart Baird had tried contemporizing the series more then. But Abrams' takes it many steps further. Star Trek feels much bigger being laced with more humor than usual and more action and stunning special effects than possibly ever seen before in the series. In some ways, this felt more like Star Wars than Star Trek (in a good way).
The content in J.J. Abrams' Star Trek warranted the PG-13 rating pretty well. There is a little bit of innuendo in the movie, but the sexual content peaks in a sequence where Kirk is seen making out with a woman -- who happens to have skin that's all green -- with both being just in their underwear. Her roommate walks in and Kirk hides, but is able to watch the roommate disrobe down to her underwear as well. The whole thing is played for laughs, but feels largely inappropriate and unnecessary. Also, there is more language in this film than in most Trek films. Kirk says the "s" word at one point, while most of the other language consists of "d*mn," "h*ll," "*ss," and a few uses of blasphemy (one "g*dd*mn," and stuff like "my G-d" and "Oh my G-d"). It could have been a lot worse, but it not only felt weird for there to be so much language in a Trek film, but it felt wholly unneeded. Lastly, there's a lot of sci-fi and action violence - most of it isn't graphic, but we do see Kirk get into a bar fight early in the movie which ends with his face half-covered in blood. Other violence includes a man being stabbed with a staff (but we don't see the impact), an alien impaled by a sword, and a significant phaser battle, among other battle-related violence. Some may also find an interrogation sequence unsettling when aliens threaten a human by shoving an ugly looking bug into his mouth. Although we don't see the act of it going into his mouth, we do see it dangling over the person's face and then see their legs writhing from a distance as this happens. It's probably the creepiest moment in the movie.
Overall, Star Trek joins Batman Begins and Casino Royale as solid "reboots" to popular franchises. This is a new Star Trek for a new era, and J.J. Abrams has done a bang-up job breathing new life into the series. Whether or not Trekkies will accept these new identities of beloved characters remains to be seen, but you're likely to see a whole new generation of Trekkies born out of watching the latest Trek film. Hopefully some of sexual content and language will be toned down in future installments (which would also make them more family friendly), but in the meantime, I'd have to say I'm armed and ready for the next chapter in this new saga. Scotty, beam me up!- John DiBiase, (reviewed: 5/8/09)
Disclaimer: All reviews are based solely on the opinions of the reviewer. Most reviews are rated on how the reviewer enjoyed the film overall, not exclusively on content. However, if the content really affects the reviewer's opinion and experience of the film, it will definitely affect the reviewer's overall rating.
|Jimmy Fortune Announces New Album, "God and Country"|
Mon, 22 Apr 2019 12:30:00 EST
|Shane Schauer Named 16th Annual Christian Songwriter of the Year|
Mon, 22 Apr 2019 12:10:00 EST
|Jekalyn Carr Releases "I See Miracles" to Gospel Radio|
Mon, 22 Apr 2019 11:50:00 EST
|Facedown Records' Comrades Announces New Album, Lead Single|
Fri, 19 Apr 2019 11:40:00 EST
|Tori Harper Releases "Revival" Today, Joins Prayer Movement|
Fri, 19 Apr 2019 11:45:00 EST
|"Father's Love" Single From Influencers Available Today On Good Friday|
Fri, 19 Apr 2019 11:40:00 EST